The Poker Challenge: Day 4

August 30, 2009

By the end of day 4 i built my bankroll to R268.22! I was doing really well. I stuck to the 50c/R1 tables and this is where i found a happy medium.

I noticed that at the 50c/R1 tables there were two types of players…players that arent afraid to go all in on a draw and players that have a nice enough bankroll to tripple up in a fast manner and that every hand played would have an avergae of R20The cheaper tables are a waste of time. Players are too caustiuos and the more expensive tables have more sharks. So best to stay clear of those tables.

So with my bankroll, i started to feel more confident and started to make bolder calls. Limp in more on cheaper hands and stay clear when the stakes rose. This was until icame across my first and final bad beat. This is how it went down.

I was dealt pocket aces. I was sitting after big blind and first to act.

1. I bet R5 pre-flop.

2. The table folded except for one player who re-raised to R15.

3.I called the R15

4.The flop was as follows. Ac, 6d, 7h.

5.I hit a set of aces on the flop. There was no ways at this stage that he was beating me. At best i put him up for a set of 6s’ or 7s’ at best!

6. I checked-decided to slow roll. The trap was set. He bet R50!

7.I re-raised to R120.

8.He re-raised to all in…R400 odd.

9.I called…putting me all-in!He was sitting with pocket 3’s!

Note: The donkey went all in with pocket 3’s against my set of aces!

10. The turn dealt a 3!

11.The river dealt the last 3!

He wins with four of a kind against my hand which was winning from pre-frop till the river. This has left a sour taste in my mouth. That is a bad beat of note and makes me wonder if online poker is the way to go. Could this have happened in a live poker game? Is this just how poker goes? Did i play my hand correctly? Was my initial raise bet too low?

So now my bankroll is non-existant and i have to regroup to see where to from here.

”All-In Stefk”

PokerShufflers Galelery – 25-08-09

August 26, 2009

Fabian Napier: Winner of Sunday Poker League

August 24, 2009

This past season we introduced  a Sunday Poker League which took place at Guzzlers in Table View. The league was a fairly small affair with about an average of 25 players. This did not affect the level of poker that was played and fierce battle developed between Fabian Napier, Amalia das Neves and Gavin Taylor.

With three games to go Amalia was out of the running.The two horse race was between Gavin and Fabian. In the end Fabian pulled of a win and has been awarded a seat in at the final table of the main league. The final takes place this Thursday at Blowfish restaurant where all the players will be playing for  a WILD CARD seat for the final table.

The top 10 players in the Sunday League were as follows:

1. Fabian Napier- 515points
2. Gavin Taylor- 485points
3. Trevor Nunes – 435points
4. Tony Manuel- 420points
5. Amalia das Neves – 385points
6. Stefano Kruger – 380points
7. Shane Mackrill- 350points
8. Brian Stotter- 345points
9. Carol Strapp- 290points
10. Monique Van Zyl- 280points

Next Page »

Navigating re-buy tournaments can be tricky. Let's do some thinking on how often to re-buy. People play re-buy tournaments in all sorts of different ways. Some move in on nearly every hand, re-buying with reckless abandon every time they go broke. Others play it as a regular tournament, leaving if they get knocked out. Most people find an approach that is somewhere in between. How do you decide what is right and what is wrong? Making No Re-buys In a poker tournament with re-buys, if you're not planning to re-buy, you should probably wait for another tournament. It is tempting to play in some re-buy tournaments because the heavy number of re-buys gives you a great overlay if you really are only going to play with your original buy-in. However, you will be at such a major disadvantage that even if you are highly skilled your chances of cashing are slim. You might be better off playing the lottery. At least it's faster. Making Multiple Re-buys If you have the money, this can be a great approach. If you make sure you always have the maximum amount of chips, your chances of amassing a big chip stack are great, because the more chips you have, the more you can win. However, if you use the multi-rebuy approach as an excuse to play poorly, moving in or calling at the slightest provocation, you may find yourself in a situation where you have to make the final table just to break even. Somewhere in Between Most re-buy players will take an in-between approach, planning to make a fixed number of re-buys and no more. If you are such a player, you should still consider that you will probably need at least six buy-ins to be competitive. Your first buy-in will get you into the tournament and an immediate re-buy will give you the maximum starting chip stack. One double re-buy will keep you in action should you get unlucky and go broke early, and a double add-on at the end of the re-buy period will let you keep pace with the other players. You may not use all six buy-ins, but if you cannot afford at least this much, you are probably better off waiting for a no-rebuy tournament to play in. Of course, according to some rebuy poker tournament rules you can only rebuy if your stack is at zero, and the number of re-buys per player can be limited to, say, one or two. These limitations make these tournaments cheaper, generally speaking, and easier to handle.